Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lcav90Fnnc8U2@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: Password not strong enough
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 19:08:16 +0800
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <lcav90Fnnc8U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <lca3qeFjp85U1@mid.individual.net> <v3ols0$qb6k$1@dont-email.me>
 <XnsB18867CE66F3hueydlltampabayrrcom@135.181.20.170>
 <748981ad-5809-6a90-5807-e64d9de3a434@example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net e61KCyk2a7QhJvlLkSW+CQM4tCXSenVTeJBGjlnY7t0RVkZYJx
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g5yXubbw5Rd5ZlzBAj57lqVTdWQ= sha256:9wF+zX42vnWG6kUIB1u5VhCttnLBXLMaX+gr9+HpJSk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <748981ad-5809-6a90-5807-e64d9de3a434@example.net>
Bytes: 2485

On 05-June-24 1:38 pm, D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024, David LaRue wrote:
> 
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in news:v3ols0$qb6k$1@dont-
>> email.me:
>>
>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:19:42 +0800, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>
>>>> LFPUxS5a2b3LWr1qt2RS
>>>>
>>>> Password not strong enough.
>>>>
>>>> Ye Gods! How strong do you want it to be?
>>>
>>> My guess is, the password checker demands non-alphanumeric characters in
>>> there as well.
>>>
>>> Which is a dumb thing to require.
>>
>> Agreed.  Silly rules that don't help protect you.
>>
>> Looks like a good password except that you posted it.  Mine is 24 
>> characters
>> long and not random if you know the pattern that made it.  My wife hasn't
>> been able to type it in even if it is written down for her to type in.
>>
>> A pharmacy site rejected a proposed long password because it contained 
>> three
>> characters in my email address.  I just call them when something is 
>> needed.
>> I'd rather talk to a human anyway.
>>
>> FWIW, I've yet to be hacked.  I've only been online since before the
>> Internet.
>>
>> I'm also glad to see you both still enjoying life.
>>
> 
> I read somewhere that someone thought that a good and well managed 
> password was way better than 2FA or 3FA since those, together with 
> modern password reset policies, leave too many gaps.

I've tried, without success, to get password resets disabled on things 
like bank account online access.

Sylvia.