Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: It Sounded Like a Good Idea...
Date: 9 Jun 2024 03:52:05 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <lckn74Fd5jbU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <lci2lcF116gU1@mid.individual.net>
	<66648c21$1$1943530$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
	<1yWdnSx6t5_zDPn7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@supernews.com>
	<66651384$0$2363133$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
	<ETWdnSwauoDFhfj7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 7VQkDMZyct1+EblF8qW1HgsWuVo9ZF3ubRkPOZvsuCd8YVuI7Q
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xJHrWI/k7LbD50PoYo3UwyoJEc8= sha256:sHaigN5AKD1rEyfSYMQ7FGvJ38+VMGcPXqsSZQ1WKDY=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1396

On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 02:50:00 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

> I would not be surprised to see MS eventually abandon this whole idea.
> Remember when Apple was going to scan everyone's photos for kiddie porn?
>  A noble idea to be sure, but an incredibly invasive thing to do. After
> a huge backlash, Apple backed down.

That would have been a fiasco. I've been told otherwise normal parents 
sometimes take photos of their offspring that could be construed as kiddie 
port if you're into naked two year olds.