Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ldejdhFamh6U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Fine. Date: 18 Jun 2024 23:26:41 GMT Lines: 59 Message-ID: <ldejdhFamh6U1@mid.individual.net> References: <17d933d9ffc8ee40$16989$3694546$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <17d943beaefb3aa2$16097$2041738$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <rPadnWt9mtOO9PP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@supernews.com> <ld7lfuF433iU2@mid.individual.net> <666f2f33$0$3102233$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <ld9ct8F8s0rU5@mid.individual.net> <FoGdnfEtJYWlDfL7nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@giganews.com> <ld9pdrFiih7U1@mid.individual.net> <17d9e261cfcdfa87$1$4081608$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <gq417jh0a5tukhqvcsr416215qdgrkorb6@4ax.com> <pan$ba8b2$eddf74ec$7edbf63f$43784830@cultnix.org> <17d9ec069a174a11$93819$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <ldee32F93giU1@mid.individual.net> <17da3a5ed089d01f$96152$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net KARIZ+x4kXdjpOUet2ye5wK6dclkFpmiKnChNBMQUilpFvwy1X Cancel-Lock: sha1:/s6EEFM3AEH3i/n0h8lupwjhqO8= sha256:HowmEnkjeWEq19ZnXwaKvAq8TOMcahycpuhxhZDEKR4= X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP` User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; 873418b; Linux-6.9.5) Bytes: 3263 On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:39:46 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in <17da3a5ed089d01f$96152$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>: > On 18 Jun 2024 21:55:47 GMT, vallor wrote: > >> >> ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE >> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2 >> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O3 -march=native >> > > That's not passing flags that's directly modifying the source > code, and it may have side effects (I don't know). I don't know either. That's why I decided to try it and see. > AFAIK, the kernel build has no method for the user to pass > custom gcc flags. Not for distro lackeys like you. Those of us comfortable with the build system, which uses make(1), can tweak it all we like. You _should_ know make(1) if you're the programmer you say you are -- or are you stuck with your distro, distro-lackey? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. > If I am wrong, then provide a link that describes the process. Your question is irrelevant to REAL PROGRAMMERS, distro lackey! Ha ha ha ha! ObLinux: DISTRO-LACKEY(7) Miscellaneous Information Manual DISTRO-LACKEY(7) NAME distro-lackey - distro-lackey information SYNOPSYS distro-lackies are the distro-bound people who pollute the Net with cries of "distro-lackey". DESCRIPTION distro-lackies are the distro-bound people who pollute the Net with cries of "distro-lackey". NEWSGROUPS The one known as "Furled Fart" can be found on comp.os.linux.advocacy. DISTRO-LACKEY joke-docs DISTRO-LACKEY(7) -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.9.5tweaked Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "Friendship is one soul in two bodies. -Frost"