Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Fine.
Date: 20 Jun 2024 01:51:01 GMT
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <ldhg85Fn9s2U6@mid.individual.net>
References: <17d933d9ffc8ee40$16989$3694546$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<17d943beaefb3aa2$16097$2041738$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<rPadnWt9mtOO9PP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@supernews.com>
	<ld7lfuF433iU2@mid.individual.net>
	<666f2f33$0$3102233$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
	<ld9ct8F8s0rU5@mid.individual.net>
	<FoGdnfEtJYWlDfL7nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@giganews.com>
	<ld9pdrFiih7U1@mid.individual.net>
	<17d9e261cfcdfa87$1$4081608$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<gq417jh0a5tukhqvcsr416215qdgrkorb6@4ax.com>
	<pan$ba8b2$eddf74ec$7edbf63f$43784830@cultnix.org>
	<17d9ec069a174a11$93819$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<ldee32F93giU1@mid.individual.net>
	<jAednegtV726m-_7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<ldei36F93giU4@mid.individual.net>
	<6672cfdc$0$2422109$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net VtUmJBLAIDdmODj7qxPOvw8iM/LQ6QsmNnftMUJtI/dKpPv8LM
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nf/exlISLqAx0wGLyZRZ5ZZekuQ= sha256:RwzEQDFlq/83NMkhlQhIliXdYa+26ID14oiVmTAaSA0=
X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl
 CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP`
User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; 873418b; Linux-6.9.5)
Bytes: 2994

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:32:31 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
<6672cfdc$0$2422109$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On 6/18/2024 7:04 PM, vallor wrote:
> 
> 
>> Posting with a Linux optimized beyond the defaults is very on-topic,
>> since you CAN'T DO THAT WITH WINDERS(!).
> 
> 
> Why do you have to turn it up to 11?  What was wrong with 10?

Because 11 is faster than 10.  Vroom!

(Actually, truth be told, I can't tell the difference.)

> What was wrong with the kernel you had in March, that you've already
> replaced 3 or 4 times?

It's not the latest from Linus.

> Why are you so dissatisfied with Linux that you have to constantly
> update it?

"Have you stopped beating your wife?"

Seriously though, I'm not "dissatisfied" with it,
just seeing how the newest stable kernel compiles and runs.

Who knows?  I might spot another bug and once again, contribute
to Linux.

BTW: since I can't really tell any difference between the "-O2" and
"-O3 -march=native" kernels, I'm probably not going to do that
trick for the next iteration.

> Aliens movie    : "Let's rock!!!"
> 
> GuhNoo adherents: "Let's tinker!!!"

Cute, but that makes no sense in this context.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.9.5tweaked Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "Half the lies they tell me aren't true. --Yogi Berra"