Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:11:56 +0200
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <ldobecFpb8bU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <6675e44b$0$11435$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <667698af$0$3329$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Zq9Zh4yaF1bnVxGVIVl+dQAs/juN/comjP0wGQ2f6DdmGuH4dJ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:67wvZD5vkRf18IFyQ7s/AcdeM0A= sha256:2lYqlIJBVY84mP8cOaNl7NqzPKuCqxdtsxNH6m7bzJ0=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Bytes: 1570

On 2024-06-22 09:26:07 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
> 
>> It will take more than vacuous denials if you want to be convincing.
>> Try this:
>> "FRAMING HYPOTHESES: Conceptions of gravity in the 18th and 19th
>> centuries"
>> Frans van Lunteren c.1991
> 
> In the 18th century they already knew
> that gravity is caused
> by the accumulation of phlogiston.
> 
> See: "Flogiston en andere nieuwlichterij" (Frans van Lunteren)
> <https://dwc.knaw.nl/column-flogiston-en-andere-nieuwlichterij-frans-van-lunteren/> 
> 
> for an up to date reference,
> (learn Dutch first to keep you busy)

Not necessary. Google Translate does a good job with Dutch.

-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots