Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Find "py.exe" & copy it to "Python" (flat, no extension).
Date: 26 Jun 2024 16:26:17 GMT
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <le2tp8Fd30jU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <v24179$1c3qk$2@dont-email.me> <v246gl$1d8oq$3@dont-email.me>
	<lamt35Fcgq7U4@mid.individual.net> <v26rjl$21vl0$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2ccjg$39nup$2@dont-email.me> <69sj4j50b5jb8mnbc37b1aopn58vpj0a5q@4ax.com>
	<v33cu1$ddl1$10@dont-email.me> <2Nj5O.33580$9xU7.24227@fx17.iad>
	<v36bpp$10k3v$1@dont-email.me> <PKE5O.17601$8CY1.13682@fx37.iad>
	<v3j4vt$3j4v3$1@dont-email.me>
	<665d1d57$0$2363138$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
	<v5dlar$1dttg$2@dont-email.me> <memk7j5epu65t50ajn5vcbamj5s5uku5ig@4ax.com>
	<v5dpgc$1eh23$6@dont-email.me> <c8xeO.13067$zMs3.416@fx48.iad>
	<v5eb77$1hofv$1@dont-email.me> <v5fn3u$1pj51$3@dont-email.me>
	<le1koaF77bmU1@mid.individual.net> <v5haef$266pr$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net HnwukdKkrT8aghH4eXPvyw/3VHbdSsbhfiPRQxhBbUM3FSNO0Y
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XO+R1maPoQy7XGmvZe8kqRwfs90= sha256:+LeCyxUoLLc4nalzGHtVNRM4J8Zwbp39kOfkfX89Ks4=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 2366

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:00:32 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> On 2024-06-26, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>>
>>> . All of which ultimately give "Evolution"
>>> creative powers that can anticipate future needs and somehow
>>> (supposedly by chance) "create" complex organs, like eyes — and not
>>> once, but every different type of eye. Chance is a pathetic
>>> explanation for the complexity of life. It's just too stupid for me to
>>> accept. I'm not that gullible.
>>
>> Teleology and biology have a long and complicated relationship.
> 
> A relationship that evolution fails to explain.

Biology should not be concerned with teleology. There is no Teilhard de 
Chardin great plan. 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' and its friends are the 
favorite human fallacy. Here we are and there must have been a reason 
rather than a few billion years of a genetic drunkard's walk algorithm.