Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <leee5sF597nU1@mid.individual.net>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<leee5sF597nU1@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: moi <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: ancient OS history, ARM is sort of channeling the IBM 360
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 02:13:30 +0100
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <leee5sF597nU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <v5rcui$fqgj$1@dont-email.me>
 <memo.20240630131648.956b@jgd.cix.co.uk> <v5s173$jl70$1@dont-email.me>
 <ca85f8bff2ea585a070f8c784e6070dc@www.novabbs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net HI9x+BgHxY1xP6hTWHIDIQJdkrTGhyWKvrLldMj0dIuP3HW7ZO
Cancel-Lock: sha1:te/ybnHhpCt/DkWUTTfsgbvMWuo= sha256:ilU9h+NZfPd5g14U5PHd0pPgkchd0rh2xi3hmkvTcbI=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <ca85f8bff2ea585a070f8c784e6070dc@www.novabbs.org>
Bytes: 2361

On 30/06/2024 19:44, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
> Stephen Fuld wrote:
> 
>> John Dallman wrote:
>>
>>> In article <v5rcui$fqgj$1@dont-email.me>, tkoenig@netcologne.de
>>> (Thomas Koenig) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Imagine a process which resides at a certain address.  It contains
>>>> code, data, and pointers to data.  Now you swap it out and want
>>>> to reload it.  You can use the same base address, then everything
>>>> is fine.  Or you can use a different one, where do the pointers
>>>> point, especially registers which contain addresses?
>>>>
>>>> The /360 tried to solve this via base pointers, which all addresses
>>>> were supposed calculated relative to to.  Hence the RX and RS
>>>> instraction all had a base register + 12 bit offset for their
>>>> addressing modes - swapping out the base registers (if you knew
>>>> which ones they were, was this info in the executable?)  should have
>>>> worked.  But the SS instructions for decimal arithmetic did not have
>>>> base pointers, so that solution did not work in the general casse.
>>>
>>> And only a 12-bit offset, to boot. I've read of systems with base and
>>> limit registers, where all accesses were offsets from the base (or
>>> separate base registers for code and data).
>>
>> Yes, e.g. Univac 1108.
> 
> S.E.L 32/65 but not 32/67 or 32/87
> CDC 6600 7600
> CRAY-1 1/S

Ferranti Orion 1960
EE KDF9 1960
ICT 1900 Series 1964

-- 
Bill F.