Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 09:39:14 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <lf851jda8cqj46e42ak1vt91hc4f90v0rr@4ax.com>
References: <25Ccnb-dnerIwo37nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3845f233a098e$3282$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com> <0B2dnfnk4IawGI37nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-A4D504.11411606042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp> <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-8F2975.20213706042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp> <rwtQN.106743$Wbff.48428@fx37.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:39:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae93369674d7abc83092727db4f8d031";
	logging-data="2947738"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AshnVckxjtLW3v3hnWsPYVbyNtaD9YNg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vq/wv1QkTDM0J6oZyARhnJFuw74=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240407-2, 4/7/2024), Outbound message
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 04:17:10 -0500, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

>On 4/6/24 10:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>   moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4/6/2024 2:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>>    moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>     moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted?  Fyi,
>>>>>>>>> *that* would be a violation of 'free speech'...
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>> No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory
>>>>>>>> statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free
>>>>>>>> speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from pointing
>>>>>>>> out your wrongness.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had made a
>>>>>> different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is other than
>>>>>> it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion
>>>>> about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting.
>>>>
>>>> No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your
>>>> own opinions but you can't have your own facts.
>>>
>>> No? The law *isn't* text that SCOTUS has opinions about? ...as I may?
>> 
>> No, SCOTUS opinions become the law.
>
>
>LOL!  You misspelled "Majority opinions."  I can see why you failed the 
>bar exam.


Distinction without a difference is noted.