| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lfqgtuFr1a6U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: [Meta] Wait, you sort your books how??? Date: 17 Jul 2024 18:30:22 GMT Lines: 80 Message-ID: <lfqgtuFr1a6U1@mid.individual.net> References: <v738di$n4rq$1@dont-email.me> <lfknm2F2dnU1@mid.individual.net> <v73m1i$phqk$1@dont-email.me> <v75s0q$19fdl$1@dont-email.me> <v76rea$1f4dn$1@dont-email.me> <v78her$1rp7a$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net /ev18B6cBkNg7rQTU+vidg2mm3NCNjc2EJc6GruQEdrgpDQE2l Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZO92AMyPw1C8PzN8lmMy2GDGdVU= sha256:s/Pv7vnnEMT4AHXyzpY6V0ZGSkqLXPILqUYeDpwwKT8= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Bytes: 4926 On 2024-07-17, BillGill <tonisdad215@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/16/2024 5:15 PM, Ahasuerus wrote: >> On 7/16/2024 9:19 AM, BillGill wrote: >>> On 7/15/2024 12:25 PM, Ahasuerus wrote: >>>> On 7/15/2024 9:48 AM, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote: >>>>> In article <v738di$n4rq$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>> Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> More signs of madness in this crazy world: >>>>>> >>>>>> I just ran across the results of a poll that asked 29,000 Americans >>>>>> about their book-owning habits, and friends, I am shocked — shocked! — >>>>>> to report that there are people who have absolutely no organizational >>>>>> system whatsoever. Worse — worse, I tell you — there are some who sort >>>>>> their books by color. Color! >>>>>> >>>>>> Here’s a link to the main source (published in October): >>>>>> https://today.yougov.com/society/articles/47712-how-many-books-americans-own-and-how-they-organize-them >>>>> >>>>> I could read the link, I suppose, but I wonder how many people actually >>>>> have a sufficient number of books such that they need to be organized. >>>> >>>> As a general observation, the viability of various organizational >>>> systems depends on the number of books to be organized. What works >>>> reasonably well for a few hundred books -- e.g. sorting by the >>>> author's last name -- may be problematic for a collection with a few >>>> thousand books and completely unworkable for a collection that >>>> contains tens of thousands of books. >>> Have you checked your local library lately? They do have >>> thousands of books. They use a system that separates the >>> books by class, first fiction and non-fiction. Then >>> they separate the non-fiction according to the Dewey Decimal >>> Code. The Fiction is separated into a number of sub >>> classifications, such as General Fiction, Mysteries, >>> Science Fiction, and of course Children's. Then within >>> those categories they are sorted by the author's last >>> name. >> >> [snip] >> >> It's a viable system for certain types of use cases. Unfortunately, any >> system that sorts books "by the author's last name" comes with inherent >> limitations. Suppose you have N bookcases dedicated to authors whose >> last name starts with an "H". Everything is fine as long as your library >> is static or close to it. Then you discover that you absolutely love D. >> K. Holmberg (https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?200173) and/or Nathan >> Hystad (https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?249647) -- to pick two >> random prolific authors -- and suddenly you have a problem. > > I'm don't understand what the problem is. Are you suggesting that > the books are packed in, so that there is no room to insert that > many more? If that is the case all you have to do is to move > books on down the shelves to make room. I have been known to do > that. Or, best case, build new shelves and spread the existing > books out to make room. I have been known to do that. "All you have to do"?? I have 88 shelves of alphabetical by author mass market sized sf paperbacks (probably another 7-8 shelves of sf paperbacks sorted by other criteria such as anthologies, Star Trek, and then my Favorite bookcase is mixed with hardcovers). When I "discover" a "new" author like Elizabeth Bear and have to fit in another 10-15 'B' books, it poses a problem! My solution is (or was) to have a staging bookcase that all my new books went on. So mostly just two places to look to locate specific books. When the staging bookcase filled up every couple of years, I would do a massive merge sort to shift my whole library and empty the staging bookcase. Now that I'm buying almost exclusively e-books, the staging bookcase has been taken over by other special purpose shelves like manga. I would note that I find it much harder to find my e-books to re-read than I did with the physical books. The staging bookcase was nice for recently read good books! Chris