Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lg12vgFq3poU7@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Le_pi=C3=A8ge_parfait_=28the_perfect_trap=29?= Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:15:16 +0200 Lines: 38 Message-ID: <lg12vgFq3poU7@mid.individual.net> References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v71c86$a0te$1@dont-email.me> <fCidXYmBeggYm31OO1-5v64V0S8@jntp> <v736bn$mo0c$1@dont-email.me> <yX3K1wOobcIp1KzCuRuRL0Htcvg@jntp> <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me> <ch2jfWaArdOfK3yzPPitxq9HA-A@jntp> <v75ner$1828i$3@dont-email.me> <Bd8mOA-8nINExuba8PnEg4CG9rI@jntp> <v76fvs$1d5jc$1@dont-email.me> <y2JkxT04PJ9pNpvNVb0oXaWVKOw@jntp> <v76i7r$1d5jc$3@dont-email.me> <lfp9aaFkr1mU2@mid.individual.net> <v78dem$1r5au$1@dont-email.me> <lfrrnfF22urU5@mid.individual.net> <v7bkir$2h9g3$1@dont-email.me> <lfusn3FfohpU8@mid.individual.net> <v7den4$2sqhj$4@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net v+Ocq8zUxrrzc4qpBUsVXA60eaJ64B+ftAsAzig5qDHmukcRoI Cancel-Lock: sha1:CeSJvhl0SNh+hq4ekulhXtmbeyY= sha256:IUNYlh4UW3ra0Xz0jpsjjXNDiqmTjdHZi8bAHBj/bzA= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <v7den4$2sqhj$4@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2538 Am Freitag000019, 19.07.2024 um 12:21 schrieb Python: .... >> >> Sure, but 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' did not cover >> acceleration. >> >> ('acceleration' occured only in connection with electrons) >> >> This went as far as this: >> >> Einstein wrote, that because something is valid for movement along a >> streight line, it must be valid for any polygonal line, too. >> >> >> But that was nonsense (actually funny nonsense), because that >> 'something' was streigth lateral motion with constant velocity. >> >> Now it is not possible at all, to move with constant velocity along a >> polygonal line, because that would cause infinite acceleration in the >> corners. > > And you pretend to be an engineer... LOL ! > Well, at least I have a diploma and am allowed to use the academic degree 'Dipl. Ing.'. But anyhow: would you really allow constant velocity along 'any polygonal line'?????? To me this is blatant nonsense, because acceleration depends on the radius of curvature of the path and in a sharp corner with zero radius the acceleration would be infinite. TH