Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lg28hjtvcnh6csh7u9ujnn7aojf80b51im@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: Diagnostics
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:58:13 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <lg28hjtvcnh6csh7u9ujnn7aojf80b51im@4ax.com>
References: <veekcp$9rsj$1@dont-email.me> <veuggc$1l5eo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <veummc$3gbqs$1@dont-email.me> <vev7cu$1rdu5$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vevb65$3mr5m$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2782408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="h5eMH71iFfocGZucc+SnA0y5I+72/ecoTCcIjMd3Uww";
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2229
Lines: 34

On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:05:14 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

>In the US, ANYTHING can result in a lawsuit.

Yes.

> But, "due diligence" can insulate the manufacturer, to some extent. 
> No one ever *admits* to "doing a bad job".

Actually due diligence /can't/ insulate a manufacturer if the issue
goes to trial. Members of a jury may feel sorry for the litigant(s),
or conclude that the manufacturer can afford whatever they award ...
or maybe they just don't like the manufacturer's lawyer.

Unlike judges, juries do /not/ have to justify their decisions,
Moreover, in some US juridictions, the decision of a civil case need
not be unanimous but only that of a quorum.


>If your doorbell malfunctions, what "damages" are you going
>to claim?  If your garage door doesn't open when commanded?
>If your yard doesn't get watered?  If you weren't promptly
>notified that the mail had just been delivered?  Or, that
>the compressor in the freezer had failed and your foodstuffs
>had spoiled, as a result?
>
>The costs of litigation are reasonably high.  Lawyers want
>to see the LIKELIHOOD of a big payout before entertaining
>such litigation.

So they created the "class action", where all the litigants
individually may have very small claims, but when put together the
total becomes significant.