Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lg28hjtvcnh6csh7u9ujnn7aojf80b51im@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded Subject: Re: Diagnostics Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:58:13 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <lg28hjtvcnh6csh7u9ujnn7aojf80b51im@4ax.com> References: <veekcp$9rsj$1@dont-email.me> <veuggc$1l5eo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <veummc$3gbqs$1@dont-email.me> <vev7cu$1rdu5$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vevb65$3mr5m$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2782408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="h5eMH71iFfocGZucc+SnA0y5I+72/ecoTCcIjMd3Uww"; User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2229 Lines: 34 On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:05:14 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: >In the US, ANYTHING can result in a lawsuit. Yes. > But, "due diligence" can insulate the manufacturer, to some extent. > No one ever *admits* to "doing a bad job". Actually due diligence /can't/ insulate a manufacturer if the issue goes to trial. Members of a jury may feel sorry for the litigant(s), or conclude that the manufacturer can afford whatever they award ... or maybe they just don't like the manufacturer's lawyer. Unlike judges, juries do /not/ have to justify their decisions, Moreover, in some US juridictions, the decision of a civil case need not be unanimous but only that of a quorum. >If your doorbell malfunctions, what "damages" are you going >to claim? If your garage door doesn't open when commanded? >If your yard doesn't get watered? If you weren't promptly >notified that the mail had just been delivered? Or, that >the compressor in the freezer had failed and your foodstuffs >had spoiled, as a result? > >The costs of litigation are reasonably high. Lawyers want >to see the LIKELIHOOD of a big payout before entertaining >such litigation. So they created the "class action", where all the litigants individually may have very small claims, but when put together the total becomes significant.