Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lg3fndF7gruU6@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad Subject: Re: phone migration Date: 21 Jul 2024 04:05:01 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 32 Message-ID: <lg3fndF7gruU6@mid.individual.net> References: <xn0oogpi840u91p006@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7bus2$2j5p4$1@dont-email.me> <v7cn13$rib$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7cn8u$2qi5v$2@dont-email.me> <xn0oohzeu59yq4p000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lfvrpdFl2sfU2@mid.individual.net> <v7gpku$30u1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7gqp2$3kern$1@dont-email.me> <lg2kusF3ldlU3@mid.individual.net> <v7h7q8$45p8$1@solani.org> <v7h8ts$3mq5c$2@dont-email.me> <xn0oojrog77xreu003@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7ha0e$3mq7b$4@dont-email.me> <xn0oojs1w78h77k005@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7hlpp$3o9o2$2@dont-email.me> <v7htgd$4fib$1@solani.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net T1dbaaNx+YH3ztwftAhPDQ6YpdOajWb0FB95GtrHfjgBhwFb2Y Cancel-Lock: sha1:xsWGY+TA35XGycjPKbsCC5lUc3M= sha256:6Ax3l8yxWseqhmtksKNF7fGNCWEEiC3hy9zmZb6LzsM= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2619 On 2024-07-21, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >> On 2024-07-20 14:38, badgolferman wrote: >>> >>> By the way, I appreciate that you are not rude and obnoxious like >>> Jolly Roger. It is far more pleasant conversing with you. >> >> Well thank you. >> >> But you should consider be more forthright about things you're wrong >> about. >> >> You said: >> >> 'I wanted to know what he found objectionable so those specific items >> could be addressed. ' >> >> I provided those specific things... >> >> ...and you never replied on point. >> > > I never said *I* would address them, because I don’t have the > technical knowledge. But they were addressed by others. Ever the coward. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR