| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What? Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:03:02 +0200 Lines: 36 Message-ID: <lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net> References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net> <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net> <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net> <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net> <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net> <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net> <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Gw8uXXr0x2MDlDKsicAz7w2DsHAUkMAAHd2VOuijb4skNNm8nQ Cancel-Lock: sha1:HwbQebNAulULzZzLq92RnB1ZCUc= sha256:FvKKHXwRWJVikezbvNI8WXFkTtvEvTzTK3fA261gpdk= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2387 Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python: .... >> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, >> hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of >> science. >> >> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful. >> >> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts??? >> >> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be >> told about it. > > Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth, > Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how > stupid your claims are? > > There is a far simpler way to explain everything > - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'! You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+ errors I have found in Einstein's paper. Here it is: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at least a single one. .... TH