Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:03:02 +0200
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net>
References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net>
 <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net>
 <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net>
 <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net>
 <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Gw8uXXr0x2MDlDKsicAz7w2DsHAUkMAAHd2VOuijb4skNNm8nQ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HwbQebNAulULzZzLq92RnB1ZCUc= sha256:FvKKHXwRWJVikezbvNI8WXFkTtvEvTzTK3fA261gpdk=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2387

Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
....
>> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, 
>> hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of 
>> science.
>>
>> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful.
>>
>> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts???
>>
>> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be 
>> told about it.
> 
> Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth,
> Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how
> stupid your claims are?
> 
> There is a far simpler way to explain everything
> - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article

This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!

You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+ 
errors I have found in Einstein's paper.

Here it is:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view

If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at least 
a single one.

....


TH