Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:27:53 +0200
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <lg68ujFkc14U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net>
 <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net>
 <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net>
 <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net>
 <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me> <lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net>
 <v7ioj3$101u$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net HxjAArd+uaXc79t1xEUxHwZAWwVl9EjjNuXJfS0xU984cZfQ84
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cDIW9G8/1p3ZKz22KSKocbYp05c= sha256:24LftN+FzBQYRz/kNWMZgrsz0o0O7a1ogR/1XOY3HAU=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v7ioj3$101u$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2947

Am Sonntag000021, 21.07.2024 um 12:40 schrieb Python:
> Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>> Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
>> ...
>>>> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, 
>>>> hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of 
>>>> science.
>>>>
>>>> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful.
>>>>
>>>> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts???
>>>>
>>>> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would 
>>>> be told about it.
>>>
>>> Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth,
>>> Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how
>>> stupid your claims are?
>>>
>>> There is a far simpler way to explain everything
>>> - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article
>>
>> This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!
>>
>> You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+ 
>> errors I have found in Einstein's paper.
>>
>> Here it is:
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view
>>
>> If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at 
>> least a single one.
> 
> Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively
> debunked here, by me and others.
> 
> That you are such a demented stubborn imbecile who refuses to admit it
> does not change anything.

Stubborn: yes, but demented: no!

So: were are YOUR arguments and YOUR disproof of any one of my 400+ 
comments?


TH
> 
> 
>