| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lgadnbt0ge3dIeX6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 04:42:40 +0000 Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <ubb0nj5ioc4r3gbqhmmiprdejtefj1j6mm@4ax.com> <vkrt3d$12a03$1@dont-email.me> <vkseuf$16h6u$3@dont-email.me> <vksora$12a03$11@dont-email.me> <8365nj5npp9p4nvnd95p02q1chvtdic9b9@4ax.com> <fXycP.22002$zX7.1280@fx37.iad> <vkumm4$1mknq$2@dont-email.me> <ad56njho0iitpus5uu5338aiilo03lrjk0@4ax.com> <vl153n$1mknq$5@dont-email.me> <64kanjpbik33le345pi0n8u5k70fc0l6c7@4ax.com> <vl3rdd$2rfv4$2@dont-email.me> <pan$ab344$eeb66434$32732eba$b05ba286@linux.rocks> <2o1bnj9nmnr6v45r57r9cl2eisdve0vo6i@4ax.com> <vl6vdf$3doaq$1@dont-email.me> <pan$299f6$f7fc69de$40262e84$7476a33a@linux.rocks> <vl71mh$3h8tc$1@dont-email.me> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 23:42:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vl71mh$3h8tc$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <lgadnbt0ge3dIeX6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 97 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-rnoLIql89gVg9FcpjvLi63WK5Y5wAOaKA6/G61QE12/e/bnjanAchm/YrMf1RjeRleB51SWBvd4OrTi!+V0sdPS97dfOIHNTLTK1H/82th+QJoIs4fSTt3ENHUzjZQV/YIjno34W2L866+F4TQ6Ypq6UUQMA!C2FFxu1uZnrPYUeMELt3 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 5679 On 1/2/25 4:50 PM, -hh wrote: > On 1/2/25 4:29 PM, Farley Flud wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:11:11 -0500, -hh wrote: >> >>> >>> For example, good luck finding a 1/2" power drill for sale new today for >>> just $100 which will last for even 10 years of use, let alone his >>> "25-50" claim: the days of bulletproof all metal body Craftsman or >>> Black & Decker power tools are long since gone. >>> >> >> I don't need "luck". I purchased a Milwaukee 1/2" for about $100 >> (maybe more maybe less). Milwaukee power tools are renowned throughout >> the industrial trades as being perhaps the ultimate in quality. > > Yeah, Milwaukee's good, but they're not $100. I've had probs with battery-pack life, same with DeWalt .... Mostly have Makita stuff now. However Dad's mid-60s metal-body SKIL drill still works perfectly ... He DID have one with like a 7/8th chuck and a big accessory handle. Low speed, ultra- torque. Mostly used to drill big holes in concrete. Damned thing could literally break yer arm if it hung up. Lost in fire I think ... > Grainger's price is $187+: > > <https://www.grainger.com/product/3DU39> For fun, check Grainger wholesale -vs- retail prices. It'll SHOCK you sometimes :-) > Of course, you're free to go buy from someplace else, where you're > taking a risk on codeshares or counterfeits ... > > ... as well as to post the receipt to substantiate your price claim. > > >> Furthermore, all metal body construction was abandoned long ago due >> to the shock hazards. The durable polymers that are now used are more >> than an adequate substitute. > > Oh, I'm quite aware of that, because the hand-me-down that I got had to > get tossed at <40 years age because it was shorting out to the body. I > used it for awhile wearing workgloves before getting fed up and a 1/2" > Craftsman- it lasted only around 15 years before it died. These days, I > look to Dewalt, Bosch or Makita as first string. Metal body is GREAT - and will take a lot more abuse than today's plastic wonders. But you DO need to use a polarized plug - some get retrofitted with a 3-wire cord to add a real fer-sure ground. Oh, battery paks, DO look up the 'jump start' trick where you use some kind of power supply, or even another good lithium pack, to momentarily charge the 'dead' battery. Most commercial chargers assume ZERO volts means a dead pak ... but often the pak is perfectly good, just needs a tiny one-volt charge or so to fool the charger. There's a similar trick with NiCad paks - involves higher voltage, wires, and a FILE. You drag one wire along the file to pulse energy into the pak and disrupt 'bridging'. >> But this is all totally superfluous. The main point of the OP is that >> commercial software companies can easily produce software that can >> last decades, if not forever, but such software would literally destroy >> them as a business entity. Therefore they are forced into extortionate >> practices just to keep alive. > > Depends on the use case, as well as the business model. For example, > there's code that's been use for ~50 years but its not been static the > entire time: there's invariably places for improvement & patches. > >> FOSS, OTOH, has no such ridiculous concerns. > > If that were truly a characteristic unique to FOSS, then Linux > (including Android) would never have had any security patch updates. Most ALL code of any size and scope can be "improved". If not 'security' then streamlining. And yes, some of the basic algos go all the way back to young Bill Gates. They used to have contests - who could do what in the least number of bytes/cycles. Bill often won. (and then the blood-signed contract ... :-)