Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: 24 Jul 2024 21:33:12 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 37 Message-ID: <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net> References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net> <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> X-Trace: individual.net l//tfnOi6Bwon8lg8nS+Lg4NHcSlZ4er6LGyPgvPtFZnGlNx6x Cancel-Lock: sha1:XiFLP5Stcru/NfpNMh95xcPxhrI= sha256:nSYK+A13rycoJcYk8Q+DIBeJvpOcK3ysHNjtNAeozp4= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2371 On 2024-07-24, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote on 24 Jul 2024 15:48:22 GMT : > >>> For all that is in the news stories, it could be ZERO convictions >>> resulted. >> >> It's nowhere near zero. > > It's probably zero given it's the most important metric. It's not zero. Not even close. > Without convictions, the reporting of CSAM images is meaningless. There have been plenty of convictions. > The reason they didn't report it is likely because it's actually zero. No. >>> Is it worth everyone's loss of privacy for maybe zero gain in child >>> safety? >> >> Your right to privacy shouldn't be violated because someone else >> might do something wrong. > > I agree with you. > > They get zero convictions. That's a lie. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR