Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: 24 Jul 2024 21:35:02 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <lgdac6F3c6aU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7rclq$1r24r$2@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net a8rJWE2PrypBAhfQ1IDQOwf4f5UHnIAkxTLovFL6QIg0vAqXr9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:snWIAHw/Ev/DbjJimxZmgmzjQL8= sha256:IrrB/YSs5VWHh4lXssHDJPjPpO4eZSfkl83gibp0iW8=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 2506

On 2024-07-24, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
>> Chris wrote on Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:20:19 -0000 (UTC) :
>> 
>>> The NSPCC should really be complaining at how ineffectual the tech
>>> companies are rather than complain at Apple for not sending millions
>>> of photos to already overwhelmed authorities.
>> 
>> For all that is in the news stories, it could be ZERO convictions
>> resulted.
>> 
>> Think about that.
>> 
>> Is it worth everyone's loss of privacy for maybe zero gain in child
>> safety?
>
> Apple's solution wouldn't have resulted in any additional loss of
> privacy

Actually, Apple could not guarantee that, and there was a non-zero
chance that false positive matches would result in privacy violations.

> plus it only affected customers of icloud. Don't like it? Don't use
> icloud.  Simple. 

That much is true. Only images uploaded to iCloud would have been
examined by the algorithm. 

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR