Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: 25 Jul 2024 18:08:57 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <lgfilpFdqrbU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <lga8oqF8qq0U2@mid.individual.net>
 <SadOECHh26nM6EmrXRWwTBAUoJuKD0DlAhhNRbyKBdU=@writeable.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4G6UF9Y8ctxSZjg3uSqJrAoBxCdwttUXjMpY1JuOn2ZvTJX58j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A7N2l0Hu5iw16JaG+jddLDSSrJU= sha256:+1doyJXiKwgFm5hHTim4Z2m5vQIcpxexy1I2TBQFq48=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 3045

On 2024-07-25, The Running Man <running_man@writeable.com> wrote:
> On 23/07/2024 19:49 Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apple declined to comment on the NSPCC's accusation, instead
>>>>>>> pointing  The Guardian to a statement it made when it shelved the
>>>>>>> CSAM scanning  plan.  Apple said it opted for a different strategy
>>>>>>> that “prioritizes  the security and privacy of [its] users.” The
>>>>>>> company told Wired in  August 2022 that "children can be protected
>>>>>>> without companies combing  through personal data."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is one reason many people choose Apple over alternatives.
>>>>>
>>>>> iPhone.  The preferred mobile device of child molestors.
>>>>>
>>>>> This could be a new marketing ploy someday!
>>>>
>>>> Privacy for everyone is important.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I can't agree with that.  Some people give up their right to
>>> privacy when they harm others or society.  The laws are there for
>>> everyone, not just those who choose to follow them.
>> 
>> Your problem is you want to invade everyone's privacy regardless of
>> whether they are hurting anyone. That's the only way CSAM scanning can
>> work, and why Apple wisely withdrew their proposal even though it worked
>> harder to preserve privacy than any other solution.
>
> You're wrong. Apple doesn't give a rat's ass about anyone's privacy. 

Wrong. Their customers care, so they care. It's better for their bottom
line to care, so they do.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR