Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: 25 Jul 2024 19:22:24 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 28 Message-ID: <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net> References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net> <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me> <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net> <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net> <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> X-Trace: individual.net +3tnwB0NuhcKkdnIBpnkRwIPO416jzrZ/1wz85IXZ/E++mWdB9 Cancel-Lock: sha1:noBzSODBjJP7TFTC9F4V8VwL63Q= sha256:VO9w9GSs9Y9qrQguAavESS/FuYlw0iF9kMe5FP0ABf0= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2499 On 2024-07-25, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: > Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote: >> Jolly Roger wrote on 24 Jul 2024 21:33:12 GMT : >> >>>> It's probably zero given it's the most important metric. >>> >>> It's not zero. Not even close. >> >> You're simply guessing. I'm using logic. They're different logical >> algorithms. > > Nope. You're guessing just as much as JR. > > The facts - and we know you like them, but never look for them - are > that there are many convictions on a depressingly regular basis. Just > look at the press releases from the DoJ Project Safe Childhood: > https://www.justice.gov/psc/press-room My statements aren't guesses. There have been plenty of convictions. Unfortunately, there have also been privacy violations of innocent people. And that's my primary concern when it comes to CSAM scanning. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR