Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lgft48FfbfnU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: 25 Jul 2024 21:07:20 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 23 Message-ID: <lgft48FfbfnU1@mid.individual.net> References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <v7o49q$16cpi$1@dont-email.me> <v7obdd$17fqi$2@dont-email.me> <v7olme$19gq3$1@dont-email.me> <lga95bF8qq0U4@mid.individual.net> <v7q92v$1l4i5$1@dont-email.me> <v7qnha$bnp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgclidFbd6U2@mid.individual.net> <v7revb$182$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgda13F3c6aU1@mid.individual.net> <v7tm0h$1nmm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lgfa27Fcg0lU3@mid.individual.net> <v7udb5$4qn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> X-Trace: individual.net 4Fzj3DY+cGZW/NJ2ZIILEAwuNkAZvncrXPVIb4Sq5702iMh4y1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:h5dcE6Cc7mUwaueUOLmAMwb7MJw= sha256:HdKV2xpl/18NaLfitPz86E5w4VOctfTSFC8WnKLzY2E= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2328 On 2024-07-25, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote: > Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 15:41:59 GMT : > >> Nothing you can say will change the fact that a greater-than-zero number >> of people have been convicted from CSAM scanning - just like nothing you >> can say will convince me that CSAM scanning can be done without >> violating the privacy of innocent people. Things like this should not >> happen: > > I'm not disagreeing with you, Jolly Roger. > The CSAM scanning is a violating of privacy. > > The question isn't that it's a violation of privacy. > The question is whether it's worth that violation of privacy. Ask the innocent people who have their privacy violated whether it was worth it, and see what they tell you. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR