Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Google is preparing to replace RCS with MLS
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:23:24 +0200
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <lghtbaFpls7U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <leto4eFasrbU6@mid.individual.net>
 <v6ck9o$2o45$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <levauqFmm0pU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v6e626$15id$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v6efem$d3v6$2@dont-email.me> <lf06e6Fr6k6U2@mid.individual.net>
 <lf0rt7Fmm0pU8@mid.individual.net>
 <v6fhmo$2t3q$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lf1u3tF4e6pU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v6hg7d$26q0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lf2vdvF9ct8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v6hint$2u54$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <ado7mkxb4o.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <v6s8ak$1v1p$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lfi1tuFi7p8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v736m6$2a82$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg20eeFkfqU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7goff$163n$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg4b64FbavdU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7j3kt$1t9s$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg95eqF3eteU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7op3l$c3q$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net DHZKDcb3bTFOeguXURwkbQJvbgOxbMNA30Rg1kI+8mG5TL6s9q
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZjHzc3TzXCfgIC/5HxOvXZvnmrY= sha256:XFRmqXNhnFB68mu9V6mpVzVRkP5k6zkbjagar7TeoRw=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v7op3l$c3q$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Bytes: 2761

Andrew, 2024-07-23 19:26:

> Arno Welzel wrote on Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:46:36 +0200 :
> 
>>> Philosophy can & should be different among intelligent knowledgeable
>>> people, where I *never* use MFA/2FA/2SV because of the privacy flaws.
>>
>> What security flaw is known for TOTP? Can you be more specific?
> 
> I said privacy. You said security. 
> The privacy flaw in MFA/2FA/2SV is obvious. It's that second thing.

What "privacy flaw" are you talking about?

[...]
>> Newer Android devices encrypt *all* data stored on them. The whole data
>> partition is encrypted. And the lock mechanism is part of the security
>> concept!
> 
> Here's where philosophy rules the design since that requires some kind of
> lock on the phone, does it not? Remember, I don't put a lock on the phone.
> 
> I think people who put locks on their phone don't know how to use a phone.
> Or, they live in slums. And they fear every person around them. It's sad.

I give up - you don't get it.



-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de