Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: 26 Jul 2024 22:24:28 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <lgim0sFtal2U3@mid.individual.net>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net>
 <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7uduv$11n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgfte4FfbfnU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v7v1eb$8nm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
X-Trace: individual.net 1xsbdOghxgx6/fhI5W17GA32vviE/9zrymsvWp/YY2zz873bIY
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XpiE/s6bQwfIF5ol6Gsg0kX5HXM= sha256:FT17NCeHMf4Jes0N5HAaW0uDIq/c4FpRlsrDBDrF+hY=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 2680

On 2024-07-26, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 21:12:36 GMT :
>
>>> The cite Chris listed said NOTHING whatsoever about the conviction
>>> rate.
>> 
>> It certainly shows the conviction rate is higher than your claimed
>> "absolute zero". So it seems it was you who lied first. I realize you
>> want us to ignore this, but your focus on who lied demands we
>> recognize it.
>
> zealots lack a normal IQ

Straight to the insults.

> You both fabricated imaginary convictions

Actually, both Chris and I provided actual documentation of actual
convictions.

> You lied.

No, you're projecting.

> Just showing convictions is completely meaningless to this point.

No, it's entirely meaningful and disputes your bogus claim that there
have been "absolutely zero" convictions.

We're done here. 

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR