Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: 29 Jul 2024 23:36:41 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <lgqnc9F5ej4U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7rclq$1r24r$2@dont-email.me> <lgdac6F3c6aU4@mid.individual.net>
 <v80bju$2s7ns$2@dont-email.me> <lgi05eFq6vhU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v80j93$2nqsm$5@dont-email.me> <lgildlFtal2U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v85r6s$mgr$1@dont-email.me> <lgni5gFl7shU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v87gf2$d1eu$1@dont-email.me> <lgpqjfF17veU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v88jf8$j1j9$1@dont-email.me> <v88sjt$hbk9$1@solani.org>
X-Trace: individual.net JqV97zW86Q/atd0cN56kUAXx5X1e6Sek+I7yKFTiVxxfyRdro9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fn0clF86keM5mEIqCiUzvqPqeSk= sha256:lenJQo2CDFfSh7uzwykXi9fxVWPAql+BcNfHaHgvaTg=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 2730

On 2024-07-29, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-29, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Actually, a human being does review it with Google's system:
>> 
>> I was unclear. I'm not saying a human doesn't review, I'm saying that
>> given the dozens/hundreds of images of suspected abuse images they
>> review a day they won't have the ability to make informed decisions. 
>> 
>>> --- A human content moderator for Google would have reviewed the
>>> photos after they were flagged by the artificial intelligence to
>>> confirm they met the federal definition of child sexual abuse
>>> material.
>
> What kind of a person would want this job? 

I'll give you three guesses.

Guess what kind of people are most attracted to positions of power (such
as police)?

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR