Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:35:01 +0200
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <lhlo3pF8p0oU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com>
 <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me>
 <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net o3MebyTVvDCMX5zEGPSvVQR81IdPqtxMJy6VKNJaOeSK+LPnLx
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YTEhBtHYwD1guBzspCx4R9CmT5k= sha256:sUnaNIXhnVYJBZiRHHinlHsxyclwyR3w9hvWgZMV3bA=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2314

Am Donnerstag000008, 08.08.2024 um 13:17 schrieb Python:
> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> ...
>> Actually Poincare did and assumed a four dimensional 'curved' 
>> spacetime, from which Euclid's three-dimensional space is a 
>> 'sub-chapter'.
> 
> This is not true.
> 
>> This euclidean space is kind of projection into the realm of the local 
>> observer, who 'cuts' spacetime into time and space, simply by being 
>> somewhere.
> 
> This is not true.
> 
>> This is a very different concept than the usual mainstream 
>> interpretation and actually different to the interpretation of 
>> Einstein in his 1905 paper, too.
> 
> This is not true.
> 
>> Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski.
> 
> This is true.
> 
>> So Poincare's relativity is different to Einstein's, which was mainly 
>> based on Hendrik Lorentz and his 'Lorentz transform'.
> 
> This is not true.
> 
>> But Poincare regarded this concept of Lorentz as wrong
> 
> This is not true.
> 
>> (even if he invented the name 'Lorentz transform').
> 
> This is true.
> 

Would mind telling a little about your reasons to think so?

You just say:

this is true and that ain't.

But why do you think so?

TH