Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:57:33 +0200
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <li5jlpFlo18U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <65a73d72df3e6413ef3bd691f93dfa8a@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eb0d581e6ab05b$286747$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <03d91192917665366eed4777e19eeaba@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9e72s$3fish$3@dont-email.me>
 <28e6191fe1b0d86de8d155cedeb6592c@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9fmve$3t7j7$2@dont-email.me>
 <1ba79173ec9450b5c84be28c9f1964c0@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9fojc$3t7j7$5@dont-email.me>
 <964f235bdecde9d651c4352ec86d1fea@www.novabbs.com>
 <GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net NPSdyd133rE+vFdgdfsUsg72qoeEBSgNFQb+VRFOcn27cuO4IY
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eyyHyg2e/0BlOvTuBG7ZoYlgqTk= sha256:joGFlAMNvwW5faZVRcabFNa3AD0PMS6rqxd5kgayyRc=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp>
Bytes: 2612

Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 18:29 schrieb Richard Hachel:
> Le 13/08/2024 à 17:15, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> 
>   Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say?
> There is something quite strange about human beings from a behavioral 
> point of view. They say that we must form our own ideas, have free will, 
> and not swallow everything we hear.
....
> Incapable of questioning an idea that was instilled in him (he read it 
> in the newspapers) he swallows it without even making a face.
> Should we believe what scientists say? Should we believe what the media 
> say? For him, yes, we must swallow everything and not think.
> Personally, I am a conspiracy theorist and damn, I love it.
> I think we must apply methodical doubt.
> And me, when someone tells me that the Titanic hit a flying saucer, I 
> don't believe it at all. The ship was poorly designed enough not to 
> break apart in half on its own in the middle of the ocean just hours 
> after it was launched.

My own theory about the Titanic:

the Titanic was secretly swapped for her sister ship Olympic.

The Olympic had a bent bow, because she collided with a German submarine.

This turned out to be uncurable, hence the Olympic and the Titanic 
swapped their names and the Olympic was deliberatly sunken, but as 
'Titanic'.

TH