| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<li7672Ft5svU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Altered Beast <j63480576@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: Elden Ring DLC finished. Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:19:45 -0500 Lines: 85 Message-ID: <li7672Ft5svU1@mid.individual.net> References: <v93he7$9teu$1@dont-email.me> <d1mcbjd8e5h19q9lbo2b782qkg7rrmjbfk@4ax.com> <v979md$h5l2$1@dont-email.me> <v9amhq$2p8le$1@dont-email.me> <v9hr1k$cndn$2@dont-email.me> <7206c85d7aab8ddd6e0c20d1a3ff82bb07bd4346@i2pn2.org> <v9k9qc$s706$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net naAZPvmblGXnazZ+78+q1Q21RiadwPAMlPWq8Ngyk1XhK0fNjH Cancel-Lock: sha1:kdVs3vTV7IsWDZvW0j3LSp8Rakw= sha256:jf424/1t2oILxgma8g4/d/a7ye5bJ8tlIkSooBylAJM= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 In-Reply-To: <v9k9qc$s706$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 5555 JAB wrote: > On 14/08/2024 14:59, Justisaur wrote: >> On 8/14/2024 1:48 AM, JAB wrote: >>> On 11/08/2024 16:49, Justisaur wrote: >> >>>> I'm really enjoying EDF with my daughter when she wants to play it, >>>> but need to find something else to play when she doesn't. >>>> >>> >>> Yep, play a type of game too much and at some point you need a break >>> from it. Glad you've found another game* that you're enjoying but >>> I've never been into computer games that you play with other people. >>> Not that I don't enjoy it when I do it but instead it doesn't sit >>> well with my gaming is something I do when I fancy it and not >>> something that is scheduled**. >> >> Well we're both here already which makes it easier. No need to >> schedule, just when we both feel like it. >> >> I've been playing it without her a bit, but it's got 4 classes which >> you can play from the start, and it helps the other classes a bit too >> as some of the pickups (weapon & armor) you get gets allocated to >> different classes, and you can play it solo just fine. >> >> I did like playing online with EDF 5 with 4 players, but I'm not >> feeling the call to play online this time. >> > Myself and my better half used to play CoC RPG until they found the > horror a bit too much so we moved to the kinda board game Sherlock > Holmes Consulting Detective. One of the advantages was that, like you, > scheduling is just do you fancy playing. It's a bit like do you want to > watch a film tonight. > >>> **Much like some of the players I had when I started GM'ing Call of >>> Cthulhu. Out of the four players, three of them seem to think it was >>> perfectly fine just to turn up if they had nothing better to do and >>> to make it worse no fore warning they weren't going to play and no >>> apology afterwards to me or others. I did make it clear that I >>> understand that sometimes real life gets in the way but you do need >>> to make a commitment to actually playing. As that fell on deaf ears I >>> just said I'm not GM'ing then. Fortunately within a couple of weeks I >>> had found another player and I'm have a blast with just having two >>> PC's who are very invested in the game. >> >> Yeah, RPGs aren't like playing any old board-game. You can make it >> more episodic, and indeed that's how it was originally played, but >> it's far more engaging and entertaining when you have a consistent set >> of characters. >> > > That's certainly what I prefer both as a GM and a player which is why I > don't like the CoC trope, even in jest, of a GM isn't doing their job if > a character lasts more than a couple of sessions without dying or going > mad. Fortunately most GMs/players don't really think that but you do get > the odd post online from a GM 'boasting' of how the managed to kill the > whole party as though it takes some sort of skill as a GM to do that. No > the skill is keeping up of the fear of death/insanity/cosmic horror > while making sure it only happens due to player agency. > > I've also read posts from one somewhat obnoxious GM that thinks unless > your players are dropping like flies you aren't playing 'real' CoC. This sounds like Darkest Dungeon. I got ahead of the curve for a bit, have a couple level 4 guys and many 2 or 3 level guys, but it's like I'm scared to go back in and play around. It definitely has madness and death. I haven't played since the beginning of April. Keep in mind that Darkest Dungeon is turn-based, so slightly off topic. >> Everything's so ephemeral theses days, that's a hard thing to achieve >> now though. >> > > It does feel as though the online world has been a real positive when it > comes to being able to put groups together but a negative is there are a > noticeable number of players who seem to think they can just treat it > like a single player video game that revolves around them. One of the > players I kicked basically throw a huff as they couldn't make the > session next week so asked could we play a day earlier. I asked the > players as a group and one person said they couldn't make it that day. I > explained to the player that had the huff that no I'm not moving the > session for them as it means another player can't play was not going to > happen. They just didn't seem to get why I made that choice or > understand how unreasonable they were being.