Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental
 Blockage
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:09:19 +0200
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <litf80F8oi1U8@mid.individual.net>
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v9sh1e$2apq2$3@dont-email.me> <lig7svF8jpgU10@mid.individual.net>
 <v9vfe6$2qll6$10@dont-email.me> <liiprgFlcbgU3@mid.individual.net>
 <va1cbf$38k24$2@dont-email.me> <lilev0F2nlqU4@mid.individual.net>
 <va44jr$3p3aa$2@dont-email.me> <lio4hqFf36mU5@mid.individual.net>
 <va75js$blq6$6@dont-email.me> <liqnlhFr49eU3@mid.individual.net>
 <vaa3mm$sicr$11@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net quiwSJGPc5k1t5cb+d40HA5qYPiZGMemG6Y/QoaQvSP4xOzZ9j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4LCcJ89WM6NuudHfojKJyZcKcbk= sha256:ha+F9jhhk+S34K4pBrSQvKVMQivaIUYSLAcufo9CbC0=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <vaa3mm$sicr$11@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2452

Am Freitag000023, 23.08.2024 um 15:43 schrieb Python:
....
>>>>
>>>> I wrote annotations from a certain perspective:
>>>>
>>>> I treated the text in question as homework of a student and myself 
>>>> as hypothetical professor, who had to write corrections for that paper.
>>>
>>> You cannot pretend to be a professor, even hypothetical, when dealing
>>> with subject you are both ignorant of and too stupid to understand.
>>
>> I have already written, that this is a certain perspective of writing.
>>
>> I could - for instance - write a novel from the perspective of JFK, 
>> after being shot.
>>
>> You could complain, this is not possible.
>>
>> Sure, most likely this isn't.
>>
>> BUT: it's the author, who choses the writing perspective and not the 
>> reader.
> 
> The reader can evaluate the quality and soundness of a text. Yours
> is abysmally bad and absolutely unsound.

Well, nobody required from you, that you have to like my 'annotations'.

But in case of science, you need to substantiate your critique a little 
more than by just expressiong your dislike.

For instance, you could disprove a few of my annotations:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view


TH