Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental
 Blockage
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:21:21 +0200
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <ljai9sF9dfdU3@mid.individual.net>
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net>
 <vah9hs$2c43u$1@dont-email.me> <lj56luFe0luU3@mid.individual.net>
 <vak80b$2u8l5$1@dont-email.me> <lj7u0sFrj7iU8@mid.individual.net>
 <auEBm5SyMA-Yb5cmXn1nfyGIi_E@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net vaXu4rQO5OmMTAzgiLc9GQtS/9k3kWiJjJOiDJbNhPmLDGOe2N
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nlgBsAwCnHfN7pt4YVW87vCv8bs= sha256:qujBT3TYvue6nqJvMyqCRhsEdJeWRrI9Iy8KYap5LaM=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <auEBm5SyMA-Yb5cmXn1nfyGIi_E@jntp>
Bytes: 3511

Am Mittwoch000028, 28.08.2024 um 13:04 schrieb Richard Hachel:
> Le 28/08/2024 à 08:22, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>
>> That was all not under dispute.
>>
>> Sure, these equation would allow tro calculate the delay.
>>
>> (despite t_B and t_A' would be unknown at the remote side 'B')
>>
>> But anyhow..
>>
>> The problem was, that Einstein never used this value of the delay to 
>> compensate the timing value at the local side.
>>
>> If you - for instance - peep through a large telescope and look at a 
>> large clock on the Moon and see the clock show e.g. 12:00:00:00 GMT, 
>> then you would see a time too early, because your own clock would show 
>> 12:00:01:00 GMT.
>>
>> Now both clocks are actually in synch, even if the received view of 
>> the remote clock shows a different time then the local clock on Earth.
>>
>> But Einstein failed to mention the required correction of the remote 
>> signal by adding the delay to the received time value.
>>
>> This can only be interpreted, as if he didn't wanted to do that and 
>> leave the timing signal as received (what was wrong!!!).
>>
>> TH
> 
> What is absolutely essential is to re-explain things, with precise, 
> simple terms.
> How can we describe the spatio-temporal universe that surrounds us?
> What is this "apparent delay"?
> Why do two extremely well-synchronized watches show two different times?
> Why, once joined, will they start to show the same time again?

I use 'spacetime' as reference to GR and in a way desribed by Minkowski.

This is kind of four-dimensional construct, where time is is meant as 
spatial dimension.

But I interpret time as imaginary scalar and space as real and come to 
something similar to a quaternion.

This 'quaternion' (actually the signature is wrong here) is the local 
interpretation of some background (or: 'real spacetime'), which has the 
odd property to allow different directions of time.

So: an 'anti-world' could exist, where time runs backwards.

In that antiworld the local perspective would also have time and space, 
but as kind of 'anti-quaternion' in our view.

We could now add both views and come to a construct known as 
'biquaternions', which would describe and overlay of foreward and 
backwards time (and everything inbetween).

My 'theory' is actually based on this idea and can be found here:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing


TH
....