Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lk1fqiFsu39U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Drat. NTE is gone, and they took the last 5-GHz PNP with them. Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:59:28 -0700 Lines: 31 Message-ID: <lk1fqiFsu39U1@mid.individual.net> References: <6b1217f0-f55b-95b4-6516-6914d18d0e91@electrooptical.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net +lvZGiFYceDXQk887nxlYAyqK8mE95HVbnSNPJPc/J08Z2s/Oa Cancel-Lock: sha1:W1bG9ySr70o7iHAsfuPNrT3uq5Q= sha256:p7rZ3YP/ZDGKr+ffNO15G0aSLnso7wbTJytCiovEAok= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 In-Reply-To: <6b1217f0-f55b-95b4-6516-6914d18d0e91@electrooptical.net> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1989 On 9/4/24 2:54 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote: > The NTE2403, similar to the BFT92, but a bit better overall. Dunno who > actually made them. (I saw the news on s.e.repair today.) > > Rochester claims to have 1,500,000 of the 2SA1462 (1.8 GHz) for 20 > cents, but that's all she wrote. > > I have a couple of reels of BFT92s and one of BFG31s, so I'm good for > protos and small production, but I can't use PNP wraparound bootstraps > for customer designs anymore. :( > > Barstids. > Some of the good stuff is going away because there aren't many people left who know how to use it and then trigger substantial sales. How about the HFA3135 pair? Less noisy than the HFA3096 but not sure if good enough for your projects: https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/hfa3134-hfa3135-datasheet?r=532781 They are long leadtime and pricey though, often around 10 bucks. Currently 18 weeks which often is code for "could be half a year", or so ... The BFQ149 is probably to big and noisy for you. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/