Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Roland van Gaalen <vangaalenusenet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Subject: Not bored with Bruckner
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 12:40:30 +0200
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <lk5d8uFga9bU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net bz8LFRyzHV6k83EhXQrZdgzW04U1JdcTKzmBwpk4IMpht3zdNq
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3JrKKuzvm04DtOciMtbRa4c+K1k= sha256:HVr5sDn/iOfPUo6BQSPKArlLHobN1mkzkjxPPrP/Uhc=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1623

Last year I discovered there were only six Bruckner cycles or boxes in 
my collection, apart from numerous individual recordings:

Knappertsbusch (Music & Arts), Furtwängler, Van Beinum, Jochum (EMI, 
Tahra), Celibidache (EMI), and Haitink, plus various recordings by 
Klemperer, Schuricht, Giulinii, Szell. Horenstein and probably a few 
others.

At this point, I want to avoid drawing premature conclusions, but I 
think that only the Haitink recordings (Concertgebouw, Vienna 
Philharmonic) may eventually turn out to be dispensable.

Meanwhile, I have bought a few more Bruckner boxes (they're all great, 
judging from my first impressions): Blomstedt (Accentus), Knappertsbusch 
(Decca), Jochum (DGG), Celibidache (DGG), Rosbaud, Skrowaczewski, Wandt 
(Profil).

It's just a matter of priorities in this short life.
--
Roland van Gaalen
The Netherlands