Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: whatsapp interoperability
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 17:44:59 +0200
Organization: XXII
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <lklpbqFgepU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <lk16jsFrc4qU3@mid.individual.net> <lk3rldF97p4U1@mid.individual.net> <lk3rvcF85pkU3@mid.individual.net> <lk8tjgF2385U1@mid.individual.net> <36f0ejtie34qud3ldou260iibe376vb09s@4ax.com> <lkb807Fcnt4U1@mid.individual.net> <vbprmb$2i5i$1@solani.org> <lkdtifFp1taU1@mid.individual.net> <86r09pdqcp.fsf@example.com>
Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 7kQKBDmCElQLZQ4hkCnRPAGlb1CRqdyxIl6emwBRHfAEYaVh1u
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mFjB831osaTWu9lxbXvH+3bkC7w= sha256:MZAdsoTGK8GFaJutUKKMAyBJjLmuzJR1wKNpeCdhFzE=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
X-Face: j0\WO?Dcjo^V#d7Q,H$9^8N{Z|fy50vxQkToel)jNR3hmCMV8kai(fMVJ:Yk}q?t<:xHu2D )?CJ[c|zu]%I!fKb7-4~$&Mx|GT=>ux^*,A:5Cdek,y4A(DSX=oXRv7-)/AcgHiWf
Bytes: 1494

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:11:02 +0100, Richmond wrote:

> Given that you are communicating via SMS, would it be any worse to
> communicate through an interoperability bridge without E2EE?

Come again? I would have to set that up on my end (how?), but also at
their end, right?

-- 
s|b