Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux 6.11
Date: 22 Sep 2024 20:29:41 GMT
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <llbd1lF8ep2U12@mid.individual.net>
References: <ll2ldqFlncU1@mid.individual.net>
	<pan$2ca4c$cb55c12b$15e553ab$6a2e1ae3@loozers.net>
	<ll6mksFj2fgU2@mid.individual.net>
	<17f74bee5b704c29$89$2754825$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<17f74d50a832220a$1642$1111581$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
	<ll8bvlFqp7pU1@mid.individual.net>
	<pan$2d7c7$6bbe7257$a3424ceb$3da5d5c0@gnu.rocks>
	<llb0n0F8ep2U2@mid.individual.net>
	<pan$def33$a213bc3c$8c953fcc$4965f138@gnu.rocks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net m7FjZHYYfn4fUfVoXQGdoQ5SIWTKaFiAR8586EVfiwpyl6+R0r
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9qs+/a8F9NqbyXeWwyL6GDjGC30= sha256:izoXBQQLmDXpOyvjo2BDsdWy4EQySENW0wpgRVTU2e8=
X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl
 CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP`
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; 4b657684; Linux-6.11.0)
Bytes: 2939

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 17:34:05 +0000, Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> wrote in
<pan$def33$a213bc3c$8c953fcc$4965f138@gnu.rocks>:

> On 22 Sep 2024 16:59:13 GMT, vallor wrote:
> 
> 
>> Keep it.  The screenshot shows a font that -- while less jaggy -- is
>> still jaggy.
>> 
>> (My terminal emulator font is "Liberation Mono Regular" and looks
>> typeset.)
>> 
>> 
> Jaggy my fucking ass.

Okay, so your fucking ass is jaggy too.

> Your monitor must be FUBAR cheap Chinese junk.

No, it's not.

> 
> The fonts are rendered using libfreetype and in cooledit they are the
> same quality as in any other application.

Then why are they jaggy?

> On my system Liberation is clear, crisp, and impeccable.

I can't help it if you have no discernment.

https://imgur.com/bAiSkLe

That's what it should look like, not what you posted.

> Your system must be total junk, or your eyeballs must be FUBAR.

Your screenshot shows _less_ jaggies than the original screenshot
I saw, but yelling and shaking your fist at the clouds won't
change the sub-optimal anti-aliasing in the screenshot you posted.

> Also remember: my assessment is worth far, far, far more than your
> warped opinions and fucked up perception.

Everybody can see the flaws in your screenshot.  You aren't
fooling anybody.

BTW, if I were a suspicious person, I'd think you tried
to blur the screenshot to make the font look less jaggy.
Again, you're fooling nobody.

> I MANGLE people who dare to doubt my phenomenal expertise.

The only thing you mangle is your font.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.11.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "Obiwankenobiphobia: Fear of Jedi Masters"