Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_The_mathematical_Poincar=C3=A9-Lorentz_transformati?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?ons?=
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:21:33 +0200
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <llhkurF8lbmU5@mid.individual.net>
References: <42RUg_TcLuVCEPpCCJpFdI6NTVM@jntp> <vcs9r7$2q8oi$1@dont-email.me>
 <j9j1Tkqi5LGYmk5CzgXl1Ww8Qwk@jntp> <vcu6bv$365hb$1@dont-email.me>
 <humC4HOqwa8RgpL-9q5Vqw5iFsY@jntp> <vcug8l$37kdn$1@dont-email.me>
 <C9ZVACHmOnMgJMPVEMTfPtF0uBA@jntp> <vcv67d$3avt1$2@dont-email.me>
 <-1RQ6Sw8Xx8oS_AIVRs0InV8AAU@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 9ZaPWw6F+8sNO9Wy2eMuKQX8eAbaIA7V5GQv6BLyN4VJu0WNu/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:M5RViGIJBC2b7xiPkOJvnpkMgbc= sha256:/thsT9AAFHKM6Wp3LzGgs6HoBYHXjsWkFNO4Px45cd8=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <-1RQ6Sw8Xx8oS_AIVRs0InV8AAU@jntp>
Bytes: 3627

Am Dienstag000024, 24.09.2024 um 22:43 schrieb Richard Hachel:
> Le 24/09/2024 à 22:08, Python a écrit :
>>
>> Quite the opposite. They don't need hints to know you are talking
>> shit. By the way you should (you won't) think about the comparison
>> with a siren on an ambulance going forth and back. I'll post about
>> this soon, but you may want to find by yourself.
> 
> The sound Doppler effect is interesting, but well... Once again, you're 
> going to waste your time.
> You're going to show that the Doppler effect explanation works, and 
> nothing more: you're not going to get to the bottom of things.
> But you're not going to show why it works, because you take my equations 
> for total crap, despite their logic and mathematical beauty that even 
> Einstein or Poincaré didn't have.
> 
> But FUCK, that's not what's important, it's not your watermelon that's 
> going to synchronize the watches, it's not your ambulance siren, but we 
> don't care about all that.
> 
> That's not the important thing.
> 
> The important thing is to understand that the notion of a relativistic 
> frame of reference is biased if we apply it to anything other than the 
> observer himself.
> 
> The important thing is to understand that since each observer has his 
> own relativistic hyperplane of simultaneity, it is mandatory to go 
> through it to correctly and perfectly describe things.

This hyperplane of the present is always perpendicular to the axis of 
time and time is a local measure.

'perpendicular' means here (in a complex plane) a multiplication by i 
(the sqrt(-1)).

So time is an imaginary (pseudo-) scalar, if you regard the axes x, y 
and z as real.

If we place the observer in the center of the coordinate system, the 
axis of local time becomes perpendicular to the hyperplane of the present.

This is valid for all observers everywhere.

 From this would follow, that time MUST be local and is not always 
'parallel'.

Instead time could have various axes in different places, which could 
have an angle towards the time of other places.

This is actually different to usual concepts in physics, which usually 
assume time to be universal.

But, apperently, nature does not support that concept and prefers local 
time.

We could see this in many different observations in cosmology.

These range from the Pioneer anomaly to black holes.
But also jets or galaxy formation could be explained this way.

TH
....