| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<llhs7jF9t8cU3@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Can't Avoid That Shit Rust - Even On Gentoo Date: 25 Sep 2024 07:25:39 GMT Lines: 18 Message-ID: <llhs7jF9t8cU3@mid.individual.net> References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vctp2q$349f1$1@dont-email.me> <1a2dnei6z8bIPm77nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net JxnKWYlPLPJv8xOVuIFOiwt4r2kzmbZPbVfbJuEaVmaePZQVKU Cancel-Lock: sha1:K/6wazt+m5GCb89K8YnGSFYGK0Y= sha256:/geSHf1FGq3nY3MOtgQzMHXLmeY262OkAUp9jaf76N8= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1625 On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 01:44:52 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 9/24/24 3:17 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:45:16 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Still have my K&R 'C' book ... >> >> Would hope you have caught up with C99, at least. > > Ummm ... STILL mostly stick to the Original Product. > Can't go wrong. Hopefully you've moved past K&R style function definitions. afak they will still compile though. C99 added some things I use like // comments and declaring variable close to where they're used rather than a laundry list at the top of the function. With the exception of the implied int which always was sloppy form, C99 didn't rock the boat like Python 3.