Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer?
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:07:42 +0300
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <llpo9uFg7lfU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <memo.20240913205156.19028s@jgd.cix.co.uk>
 <vcd3ds$3o6ae$2@dont-email.me>
 <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org>
 <2024Sep18.074007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vcds4i$3vato$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Sep18.220953@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vcfopr$8glq$3@dont-email.me>
 <ll232oFs6asU1@mid.individual.net> <vcgo74$gkr1$3@dont-email.me>
 <ll2n1hFu4lmU1@mid.individual.net> <vchu2q$mfu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vchu67$mgk1$1@dont-email.me> <vcieqn$p8fv$1@dont-email.me>
 <AAfHO.23138$5837.19479@fx35.iad> <86jzf4829c.fsf@linuxsc.com>
 <vcpojl$2ads5$1@dont-email.me> <vct3av$2tic0$17@dont-email.me>
 <vctb0s$32gol$1@dont-email.me> <vctbo2$32cko$3@dont-email.me>
 <vcv711$3b4hf$1@dont-email.me> <vcvji5$3co45$7@dont-email.me>
 <20240925104320.00007791@yahoo.com> <vd6ucn$r6hq$1@dont-email.me>
 <lloh7bF3l7hU1@mid.individual.net> <vd7qn5$12pr5$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net EqS3ni/+GqeN3xCeWLxLxA6r0QC9iV4oSJZUQuDxLt1My4D0Bh
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+SWgh75AsYfiHCy0CippMpwZPZo= sha256:Evgc2wPJjQ3KquIZrxO9qu51LtWKbisVAN9hMtLfvLA=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vd7qn5$12pr5$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3302

On 2024-09-28 5:47, Brett wrote:
> Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-27 21:43, Brett wrote:
>>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 23:55:50 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 20:21:53 -0000 (UTC), Brett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You hear physicists talk of microscopic black holes, but the force
>>>>>> that keeps atoms apart is so much more powerful than gravity that
>>>>>> such talk is just fools playing with math they don’t understand.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would mean that neutron stars (all the atoms crushed so tightly
>>>>> together that individual subatomic particles lose their identity)
>>>>> couldn’t exist either. But they do.
>>>>
>>>> Radio pulsars exist.
>>>> The theory is that they are neutron stars. But theory can be wrong.
>>>
>>> Some of the pulsars are spinning at such a rate that they would fly apart,
>>> so we know the theory is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Which pulsars are spinning too fast? Reference please!
> 
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J1748%E2%88%922446ad#:~:text=PSR%20J1748%E2%88%922446ad%20is%20the,was%20discovered%20by%20Jason%20W.%20T.
> 
> 
> Spinning at 42,960 revolutions per minute.


The article says it is "the fastest-spinning pulsar known", but does not 
say that it is spinning faster than neutron-star theories allow, so it 
does not support your claim.


> Took seconds for google to answer.


It is the wrong answer, at least for your claim.