Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Neither rBowman nor Carpentier know what "Turing Completeness"
 means.
Date: 29 Sep 2024 18:57:09 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <lltm85F3ksjU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <66f87c6e$0$3581$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.28--3.08pm.Seattle.2024>
	<llrs5fFpsk3U2@mid.individual.net>
	<pan$c2d71$d3d418d8$76edd625$fa43220@linux.rocks>
	<66f952af$0$3253$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
	<pan$1973f$e5918326$489e0353$1135424d@linux.rocks>
	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.29--8.27am.Seattle.2024>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net FUoM8UWdxfA+NZfzsAs26gBQW75umt/XARThrJ1neU6AJNV7JP
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dK+6D3i5uTzc/RBYnjvNqrf19+w= sha256:u9IFI8tWpXrqg1/IbUGg+eh90oTs1d0GssSAYFk+IxU=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1568

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 08:27:51 -0700 (Seattle), Relf wrote:

> You(DetroitsFinest)Replied(to Carpentier):
>> > So, [as] rbowman says:
>> > "one is a Turing Complete programming language, and the other is
>> > not".
>> 
>> Blowman, like you, is a total idiot.
> 
> Neither rBowman nor Carpentier know what "Turing Completeness" means.
> 
>     %PDF-1.2 44 0 obj << /E 2248 /H [ 957 193 ] /L 57656 /Linearized 1
>     >> endobj

https://riptutorial.com/postscript

Educate yourself.