Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot
 guru
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 09:00:04 +0200
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <lm6tneFg6sqU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 9HELgiKZz6qxxQAZzN1zjgCeyUwuADxtgxSIa0ledFW7kuRmw8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QCyBoqj7lXOM3grA09ABvnQQcic= sha256:rKeja/VmhdbQe6WRAtTGt0aZNkDSJVsE5xjAA5hKtcs=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2880

Am Mittwoch000002, 02.10.2024 um 11:25 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> 
> 
> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
> solar system is measuring the length
> of solar day. What is the result predicted
> by the Einsteinian physics?
> One prediction is - 99766. From the
> postulates. The second prediction is -
> 86400. From definition.
> And similiarly with the prediction of
> a measurement of a meridian.

If you measure the length of the solar day on Earth from a spaceship 
receeding away with c/2, then you measure signals from- say- sunrise in 
Greenwich at the 0° meridian for a day.

These signals are measured with onboard clocks.

Since light is assumed to travel with c, the signal originated at 
t_0=6:00 GMT is received at a time, which is t_x1 later. This depends on 
the distance x_1, by which the spaceship has receded from Earth at t_1 GMT.

x= c* t hence t_x1 = x_1/ c

A day later on Earth the time at the zero meridian is 6:00 GMT + 1 day.

Then another message is sent to the spaceship, which had moved away with 
c/2 within that day.

For this signal the same is valid, but with a different distance x_2, 
since that spaceship is now further away.

The distance from Earth is now x_2 = x_1 + c/2*86400 s.

The time needed to reach the ship is therefore

t_x2	= (x_1 + c/2*86400 s)/c

or:

t_x2 	= ( x_1/c + (c/c) * (86400/2)s).
	=t_x1 + 43200 s

The length of a day on Earth, if measured from that spaceship is therefore

86400s + 43200 s = 129600 s (in terms of Earth time measures).

Whether the crew upon that spaceship encounters  a difference in the 
onboard measurements is a possibility, but should be subject to experiments.



TH