Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux advocacy
Date: 4 Oct 2024 03:55:05 GMT
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <lm978pFr43iU3@mid.individual.net>
References: <llecmiFnttdU2@mid.individual.net> <vde2jv$27es6$1@dont-email.me>
	<1txKO.81238$lm45.60962@fx05.iad> <vdn8m2$3tl7t$4@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net bAPusBDkblWUOL2sNP8sUQYY0vKtzD7koUp4KfNRzeQkkUv1ap
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pcHINzKUeRCHSl6LsEUSsmH28SM= sha256:6r4Qw8pJlBB0Dj1A1bT5XUDcXyApObYHUsUDGQ941i8=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1450

On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 23:17:22 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:12:28 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, Linux has _become_
>> political.
> 
> Free Software always was political. You mean you just realized? You
> never heard Richard Stallman talk about?

Stallman could politicize a discussion of what pizza toppings to order for 
dinner. It's in his genes.

> By the way, is “woke” the new “liberal”? One smear term has lost its
> smear-ability, so you are trying to create a new one?

The woke whiggers culturally appropriated that one themselves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke