Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lmcaieFas80U4@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time:
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:10:00 +0200
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <lmcaieFas80U4@mid.individual.net>
References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com>
 <66FEFBBF.3F70@ix.netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net uELwvdPqlVNjLX5NH19RYw5d9g39Yc5Uu2d4KLj8+KMU9/2FKQ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mdohQIoU7Ooo6sISch+llUtTMWk= sha256:zwRIimrQEYSFcJLm9sGWuwE3AteiLPZY88bBQvA+07w=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <66FEFBBF.3F70@ix.netcom.com>
Bytes: 2586

Am Donnerstag000003, 03.10.2024 um 22:17 schrieb The Starmaker:
> "local time" means "present time".
> 


No, that's wrong.

'Local time' means 'the direction of the timeline at a certain spot' and 
what I would call 'rythm of causality'.

If our world is actually a subspace of something with higher dimensions, 
than which features would we assume for such a 'super-space'???

My own guess was this:

there exists 'a something', which is named 'spacetime' in context of 
relativity.

We humans and all the other stuff we see are what I called 'timelike 
stable patterns' (in spacetime).

These are kind of 'structures' and the hole thing was therefore named 
'structured spacetime'.

I have written this longish 'book' (actually it is a presentation) about 
this idea:


https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing

 From this I would draw the conclusion:

this 'superspace' follows certain mathematical rules, which also apply 
to bi-quaternions and a mathematical construct called 'clifford-algebra 
Cl_3.

Why this is so, I have no idea.

Anyhow:

as this a complex valued space, we can rotate axes and the angle of 
ration the axis of time determins a certain context, which I call 'time 
domain'.

This is depending on the axis of time, hence time MUST be local.

'Present time' is only a certain spot on that axis of time, which we 
call 'now'.

This point 'drags' in a way the hyperplane of the present with it.

This hyperplane of the present is actually a 3d-space, which we usually 
call 'euclidean space'.

This Euclidean space is therefore 'relative', as well as all of its content.


TH


....