Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Scientific American
Date: 7 Oct 2024 03:30:33 GMT
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <lmh2upF2k8fU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <vdvjsi$1ipl0$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net LZxU8nP02iuuGeAujvVT8AgP2HOWsEYpOPXJWahHsV+iaw0JdW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u2lLcc2/IN/sDOQc9UIji2uWETk= sha256:CeU568hyovxZzb2Bw/RBZ/9ZamxsG285/hZv8TrZ8w0=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 948

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 03:17:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> That was a cool magazine. Martin Gardner’s maths column was how most
> people discovered Conway’s “Game Of Life”, back in the day.

The important word is 'was'. 'National Geographic' is another 'was'.