Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lmlpliFopi4U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Apple=E2=80=99s?= Custom 5G Modem Will Be An All-In-One Connectivity Solution Date: 8 Oct 2024 22:22:42 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 35 Message-ID: <lmlpliFopi4U1@mid.individual.net> References: <vdtr4m$2ing$1@solani.org> <ve1u9f$1sg5i$12@dont-email.me> <lml770Fm0qcU1@mid.individual.net> <xn0ortot6ode2b000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lmlhopFnjcjU1@mid.individual.net> <ve45cg$616n$1@solani.org> <ve49ic$2aulb$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net VTEJtRGUGqvzqrl1A3uumAokrN6R7ixSc/AMRQNHw74bpWSzbY Cancel-Lock: sha1:+3jI9MKzgdqixdeREzzEjRVrUuk= sha256:snHKG1QknDAYo686w82lycuDeqa1YH2UI3kGbkQHW0M= Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Bytes: 2745 On 2024-10-08, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > On 2024-10-08 13:40, badgolferman wrote: >> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2024-10-08, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Jolly Roger wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's Bloomberg. >>>> >>>> Where did you see this? The only outside link I see is 9to5mac. >>> >>> Interesting, because it's right there in the article. The words >>> "subpar performance" link to another WCCFTech article that >>> references Bloomberg as the source of this claim. And if you follow >>> that trail of articles, you see that the claim of supposed "subpar >>> performance" is based on speculation rather than hard evidence >>> (which is very typical of Bloomberg). >> >> Are you talking about this article? There’s really not anything in >> there blasting Apple. It only says it will take a long time for Apple >> to recoup its expenses that it already pays to Qualcomm in royalties. >> >> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-08-18/why-is-apple-building-own-modem-company-plays-long-game-in-dropping-qualcomm-lzzk8616 > > Right. > > So you posted a quote about supposed "subpar performance" with not > basis in even rumour. BINGO -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR