Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The Tragedy Of systemd
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:10:05 +0100
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <lmnkmjF2eihU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ve2l1q$23pu3$1@dont-email.me> <ve324b$25c9c$5@dont-email.me>
 <ve32mf$24soc$10@dont-email.me>
 <ec87a715-b8f2-41f9-9e54-bdddac49e9f6@fulltermprivacy.com>
 <6705a683@news.ausics.net> <ve4kdd$2cao4$2@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvgbpq6.2n71m.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net rox9D3cSGNcFxZQEmLkRuw7MwYb+4XFVuWzwL7re0BMac1pfiG
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uX9zlUlA67GGnEA1CFgd8Jvlxfc= sha256:YIz3E7AiGHcNhYn9W/BMM/pVe/S1wGvmweIBYCbmeDc=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <slrnvgbpq6.2n71m.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>
Bytes: 1539

Lars Poulsen wrote:

> Phillip Frabott wrote:
>>> I'm not going to disagree. Systemd is complicated compared to InitV.
>> That being says, it always comes down to what people like and what works
>> for them.
> 
> The old stuff that we remember from our youth is easy for us; to the
> degree that we remember what we did 40 years ago, we don't need to read
> the man pages.
This.  Familiarity with the old tends to make us dislike the new, my old 
knowledge was applicable across xenix, OSF/1, HPUX, AIX, multiple linux 
flavours