| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lmqub1Fi4h4U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Why All Software Should Be Open Source Date: 10 Oct 2024 21:13:05 GMT Lines: 12 Message-ID: <lmqub1Fi4h4U1@mid.individual.net> References: <pan$e0a5d$44f99416$77c9f4bd$2fb612d5@gnu.rocks> <iRicnY1n7InWpZX6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net LkcyD9Wo7R370nQfPy7hpwd6OBB6fxtmchg6XPMRPuBDrARAgk Cancel-Lock: sha1:dxRGtNQEUH9LzM4MWbnnDD7S/tY= sha256:oo8FhZqxF3g0J+vNvhgLbYQ8RGFRkNmaD4xH7y2cptw= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1359 On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 16:25:47 -0400, bad sector wrote: > The survival of society cannot be left to bean-counters so anything that > is essential infrastructure should be cost + $1 if not free (state run > in other words). That would presume a much more effective state; the current ones couldn't run a church picnic. Where they probably could rise to effectiveness is in censoring anything that doesn't have the state's seal of approval. I won't even go into how the state provides 'free' gibs by picking the pockets of its citizens at implied gunpoint.