Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: green bubble syndrome
Date: 16 Oct 2024 01:50:05 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <ln8kecFlug4U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oruv2k1siabt002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <ve6sv0$2q45v$1@dont-email.me> <ve7s0q$31vac$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve7uos$7t6o$2@solani.org> <vebtjl$3pa58$1@dont-email.me>
 <lmtv4oF2u71U2@mid.individual.net> <vee0md$6nme$1@dont-email.me>
 <UzwOO.61464$Enpe.23712@fx38.iad> <veebvs$8lna$1@dont-email.me>
 <iKBOO.384861$WOde.118415@fx09.iad> <veesur$ba5e$1@dont-email.me>
 <gaEOO.225752$EEm7.177339@fx16.iad> <ln2j5dFo72qU7@mid.individual.net>
 <veii30$145rh$1@dont-email.me> <ln50p7F4u5nU4@mid.individual.net>
 <vejtrr$1b2nm$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net rOAPEtv4h9VKmpP+qjRzkwAtJ+ZnyOzzJnNzd3Y3OLoWaiI5Yx
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2GvGk9fh9TbNi5VqeV3xqZIPOsU= sha256:gJJ85AwUo/+G1QhKoa3CeErFNXHfPnGiYuNx3zayEuc=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 2866

On 2024-10-14, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-14, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-13, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-10-12 18:24, Chris wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> For someone wishing to end the discussion you've gone quite into
>>>>>> some depth to try and find flaws. Of which, most are open to
>>>>>> interpretation and none are unique to this org.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why so desperate to find flaws when wanting to end the discussion?
>>>>>> Simply not responding would be easier.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can't argue with you on that, other than the "depth" of my flaw
>>>>> search.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This whole subject was patently flawed from its troll induced
>>>>> beginning, however.
>>>> 
>>>> And as usual, it's the people scrutinizing 
>>> 
>>> There's been no scrutiny. It's all been knee-jerk reactions from an
>>> entrenched position. 
>> 
>> That's a lie. Expecting to know more about the poll than the pollsters
>> divulged isn't a knee-jerk reaction, 
>
> It is when you're only interested because you don't like the result. 

I haven't stated anything like that. More dishonesty on display. You're
trolling.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR