Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <loGcnS4oQKCg_sf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<loGcnS4oQKCg_sf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 04:14:53 +0000
Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vj1m3f$33eu5$16@dont-email.me> <947j2lx3qf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <lrolhlFkmd2U1@mid.individual.net> <vj77pi$f8rj$9@dont-email.me>
 <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net>
 <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net>
 <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <a2247e79-41bd-a62e-1196-b12cd9385b96@example.net>
 <qmCdnbXw77vmtcT6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <20241211084303.00006d53@gmail.com> <vjcfu1$1k27r$5@dont-email.me>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: wokiesux
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:14:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vjcfu1$1k27r$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <loGcnS4oQKCg_sf6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-EajWXtns4W/7O609UkGgB/kLiuyY8TEHzVXAMu3OtFtzSIK6YPCQuOOCjzavjzEdup6jhjwOPvjAC56!EBsB3WwmCGrt3caFqIKyM+qppkzcuXs0h80CB/1J6bUJdTYqTVr9kWu2u1h9M/XFF+8bbwQjQIXR!1zZUh9bejUEKxSsK0rfi
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3215

On 12/11/24 11:51 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 11/12/2024 16:43, John Ames wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:51:47 -0500
>> "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Better innovate SOMETHING, otherwise we're gonna see 'peak computing'
>>> when it's become clear we need thousands of times that for the Really
>>> Cool Stuff.
>>
>> I've long been of the opinion that things're gonna get Real Interesting
>> when Moore's Law finally his the wall and "throw a beefier rig at it!"
>> is no longer a viable pitch for any "your X isn't delivering Y fast
>> enough for project Z!" problems.
>>
> We have already hit it.
> 
> Hence the proliferation of multiple cores.
> 
> Which works for multi-user and multi-threaded operations, but not 
> necessarily for linear single thread code.

   Very correct.

   In some respects it's a "how do we DEFINE computing ?"
   sort of thing. A bunch of Nvidia chips doing "AI" is
   one way of looking at it. The peta+ FLOPS you may want
   to solve a supernova implosion or horrific math equation
   is another. In short 'performance' now has to take a cue
   from "What We WANT done" rather than the olde-tyme
   benchmarks.

   Not everything can be 'parallelized' either ... some
   jobs just require vast instructions-per ...

   As said elsewhere, 'pure photonic' tech MAY provide
   the ultimate - 10x to 100x what we're seeing with
   the low-nanometer transistor designs. But, in this
   universe, that's kinda IT.

   We need a new universe.