Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lp7svvFu71gU1@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders)
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:05:09 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <bcfc1c5a30d87ec65328e93132675bb6@www.novabbs.com>
References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="498968"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$i1MQcHbLMXe1vyuqiUo2S.09mJzgGQ6QX8Z7mgLEyZAK3t7P07X8a
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
Bytes: 1489
Lines: 15

On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 9:14:02 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:

> Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible.
>
> It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative.
>
> Besides the so called law of conservation of energy is nonsense as shown
> by the phenomenon of radioactivity. Explaining that with e=mcc is even
> more nonsense.
>
> High time the world quitted bad physics and followed Arindam's physics
> that updates Newton and rejects Einstein.
>
> Bertietaylor

Up Arindam Down Einstein!