Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lq7s6oFp7qgU5@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT
Date: 21 Nov 2024 04:45:12 GMT
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <lq7s6oFp7qgU5@mid.individual.net>
References: <kPCcnXzSs9DzI6f6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhlroj$aj9r$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net eF3iw8V9VZkziqfnE17dPgk2UE+oteksjXKXDQkyXt/N5AV8+E
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sXAGSMZTLNKLnfWQ7I2dQVj49QI= sha256:BBFQSVXXJCfW1jDyLG4c+fPSuTgifb+sd7EXV5ihTJY=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1316

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:35:47 +0800, Woozy Song wrote:

> 1000 watts TDP?
>   Seems just making more powerful chips by brute force has to end soon.

Faster == hotter. I remember a seminar about 40 years ago when CMOS was 
coming into its own and touted as low power. The dirty little secret was 
the power required to switch capacitive loads is a function of the voltage 
and frequency so the dynamic power dissipation exceeded that of 74LS parts 
when you drove them hard.

A lot has changed since then but I'm not waiting for a miracle.