Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lq7s6oFp7qgU5@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT Date: 21 Nov 2024 04:45:12 GMT Lines: 12 Message-ID: <lq7s6oFp7qgU5@mid.individual.net> References: <kPCcnXzSs9DzI6f6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vhlroj$aj9r$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net eF3iw8V9VZkziqfnE17dPgk2UE+oteksjXKXDQkyXt/N5AV8+E Cancel-Lock: sha1:sXAGSMZTLNKLnfWQ7I2dQVj49QI= sha256:BBFQSVXXJCfW1jDyLG4c+fPSuTgifb+sd7EXV5ihTJY= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1316 On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:35:47 +0800, Woozy Song wrote: > 1000 watts TDP? > Seems just making more powerful chips by brute force has to end soon. Faster == hotter. I remember a seminar about 40 years ago when CMOS was coming into its own and touted as low power. The dirty little secret was the power required to switch capacitive loads is a function of the voltage and frequency so the dynamic power dissipation exceeded that of 74LS parts when you drove them hard. A lot has changed since then but I'm not waiting for a miracle.