Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<lqkh38Fpp09U2@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that
Date: 25 Nov 2024 23:55:21 GMT
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <lqkh38Fpp09U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <vhigot$1uakf$1@dont-email.me>
	<6iKdnTQOKNh6AqD6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhl090$5ghq$1@dont-email.me>
	<w4adnUM659THQqP6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhndam$ljks$1@dont-email.me> <871pz4osys.fsf@comcast.net.invalid>
	<vhp646$12c7u$1@dont-email.me>
	<pgidnQQYp91K_dz6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhsdhp$1m6qu$2@dont-email.me>
	<X4KcnQQzFNko49_6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vhvdmo$2900d$3@dont-email.me> <vhvdqu$28p7r$7@dont-email.me>
	<vhvm34$2aerk$2@dont-email.me>
	<1b166410-ecc1-f9e5-7218-cde9618f4686@example.net>
	<lqi4odFdu06U3@mid.individual.net>
	<77840736-c143-e896-5da0-d0afae4915ed@example.net>
	<vi1p3r$2oh05$7@dont-email.me>
	<2118139f-4451-560b-5094-a3d61c05f0d3@example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 96bQSMwQzowWzISmGOwh1QPcpeK3gTljZ7Zy/c7gEwL+7/ndr1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ak+wI1kASHowt7tHZzWPdC4kEY= sha256:ji4mID/mO5qou6j11/pMNZyiRg1c8L9h7mN92vuX8IY=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 2671

On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:20:02 +0100, D wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 25/11/2024 09:55, D wrote:
>>> The problem with python is the quality of the ecosystem and the 2 to 3
>>> shift. I find the quality of python libraries lower than in perl. But
>>> I imagine that is due to there simply being more of them, and that it
>>> is a "live" language. Perhaps I found the quality better in perl,
>>> since the libraries that remain are old and mature.
>>
>> The problem with Python is it seems to be the new BASIC.
>> An entry point for PWCP People Who Cant Program.
> 
> I see that as elitist. The more people who can learn to do simple
> programming, and simplify their lives, the better!

Python doesn't have a lock on the domain. I worked with a PhD chemist who 
programmed in Fortran. He knew his chemistry but his Fortran looked like a 
train wreck. The math was good and could be extracted into production 
code. Many People Who Can't Program evolve into People Who Can Program or 
have valuable expertise in a field where being able to express it, however 
awkwardly, is valuable.

One of the job descriptions of a good manager is the ability to tell the 
difference.