Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that
Date: 7 Dec 2024 19:14:25 GMT
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <lrjl4gFq671U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <vhigot$1uakf$1@dont-email.me> <lqv3jsFgkhsU3@mid.individual.net>
	<d9f48dd4-eab8-4cf8-b163-3651be59711d@example.net>
	<vifmf1$1sj76$3@dont-email.me>
	<df71277f-b9c7-7358-c90d-27b02f8b5023@example.net>
	<vihe72$2di13$1@dont-email.me>
	<f6570ff2-9de5-8af5-2767-45e58911aaa2@example.net>
	<lr3qqvF991qU4@mid.individual.net> <vik23d$38qdo$2@dont-email.me>
	<495550f7-796e-4414-67ae-26d3f8ba16f1@example.net>
	<slrnvkvl5e.197.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
	<33442f75-5afe-ce6b-d5b2-19efc78a72d3@example.net>
	<viph19$rnso$5@dont-email.me>
	<2c1fb128-258b-7848-e896-3246674d460f@example.net>
	<lrbnamFhpcpU3@mid.individual.net>
	<2d814efc-b5f8-a1f9-d273-77016cb3cbae@example.net>
	<AoycnTASZ6Hq0Mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<ee978553-b4ea-0239-e93a-bbefa289c9d5@example.net>
	<virs73$1gno5$3@dont-email.me>
	<9cGcnY0c8c3LA8_6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<6465d1f8-6fab-e3bd-0345-86011937364d@example.net>
	<lrh6e1FdnlbU4@mid.individual.net>
	<a97cff3a-7a2a-2797-f17f-4fa39a18a523@example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net E7PnO0MycZo4mLLRpOMA8wZW4F/K9vicEAkojw2MaoyWqYmxxs
Cancel-Lock: sha1:66Kxvms43JYV4OEwc9AG6707Pgo= sha256:z/RKJce+d9BlobAZUOfFfAyL8VFPBPPjxKEIPMsNMO0=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 2715

On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 11:20:51 +0100, D wrote:

> I tried for a bit, to try and "distill" original buddhism, and although
> it was difficult to find anything specific, my feeling was that original
> buddhism was more about doing, rather than speculating, so heavily
> meditation focused, and not very speculation focused.
> 
> Another thing I found out was also that original buddhism was heavily
> adapted to the individual (naturally) where buddha tried to tailor the
> techniques and teachings to the individual he was talking with, and that
> is why it started to diverge over the millennia.

There are many flavors. The original Theravada wasn't speculative. 

https://sacred-texts.com/bud/bits/bits013.htm

Mahayana picked up a lot of Hindu metaphysics and became more ornate. The 
Tibetan branch really gets into it. But then it circles back with Ch'an 
and Zen to become more stripped down.

Of course in common practice you get the usual mythology and rituals.