| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lrkg61Fu3vdU3@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that Date: 8 Dec 2024 02:56:01 GMT Lines: 22 Message-ID: <lrkg61Fu3vdU3@mid.individual.net> References: <vhigot$1uakf$1@dont-email.me> <vifmf1$1sj76$3@dont-email.me> <df71277f-b9c7-7358-c90d-27b02f8b5023@example.net> <vihe72$2di13$1@dont-email.me> <f6570ff2-9de5-8af5-2767-45e58911aaa2@example.net> <lr3qqvF991qU4@mid.individual.net> <vik23d$38qdo$2@dont-email.me> <495550f7-796e-4414-67ae-26d3f8ba16f1@example.net> <slrnvkvl5e.197.spamtrap42@one.localnet> <33442f75-5afe-ce6b-d5b2-19efc78a72d3@example.net> <viph19$rnso$5@dont-email.me> <2c1fb128-258b-7848-e896-3246674d460f@example.net> <lrbnamFhpcpU3@mid.individual.net> <2d814efc-b5f8-a1f9-d273-77016cb3cbae@example.net> <AoycnTASZ6Hq0Mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <ee978553-b4ea-0239-e93a-bbefa289c9d5@example.net> <virs73$1gno5$3@dont-email.me> <9cGcnY0c8c3LA8_6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <6465d1f8-6fab-e3bd-0345-86011937364d@example.net> <viuubv$2bf1r$5@dont-email.me> <54f23207-1fd4-4b7b-d53b-00f74c66ff0e@example.net> <vj1i5u$33eu5$2@dont-email.me> <lrjjdhFpi64U5@mid.individual.net> <jM15P.18654$xPr6.11173@fx10.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net rqneSvo/Xco0p+PyrK8ukgAqki6GsnDio9dT/Zdwx7mAy06VV4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:fC62J8Qw88th2RjXxpVXhDCtXcw= sha256:lWdyqzicyy0Eq7j8yTWFzvF4nHjXroqnwiCopCw6jA0= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 2742 On Sat, 07 Dec 2024 19:57:03 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-12-07, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 13:22:06 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> Well the concept that no world exists is called Idealism. It's all in >>> the mind. Mine alone [solipsism], Gods [monism], or some other >>> arrangement. It explains everything but predicts nothing. Like Islam. >>> Inshallah. If it is Gods Will. Great, But not very *helpful*. >> >> I like the Epicurean approach, which was probably a concession to the >> times. The Gods exist on a planet somewhere but don't give a damn about >> humans. > > Sounds like 21st-century oligarchs. Not quite. The Epicureans thought the Gods, if they existed, were completely uninvolved rather than causing wars, taking sides in battles, fomenting unrest, and so forth. We'd be better off if the oligarchs were off in the Caribbean drinking, fornicating, or whatever oligarchs do when they're not starting wars for profit.